Skip to main content

"Who Do You Think You Are? Meet Me Outside": Convict, Lawyer Threaten Female Judge in Delhi Court After Guilty Verdict

In a shocking turn of events, a Delhi courtroom became the scene of chaos and intimidation after a convict and his lawyer launched a verbal attack on a woman judge who had just delivered a verdict in a cheque bounce case.

The incident, which unfolded before the bench of Judicial Magistrate Shivangi Mangla, has raised serious concerns about the safety and dignity of judicial officers across the country.

The case revolved around a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, pertaining to the dishonor of a cheque. Upon being convicted, the accused exploded in rage, reportedly telling the judge:

“Who even are you... meet me outside, and let’s see how you make it back home alive.”

According to the court’s order dated April 2, the convict even attempted to hurl an object at the judge and aggressively pressured his lawyer to manipulate the outcome in his favor.

The matter took an even more disturbing turn when the convict’s lawyer, Advocate Atul Kumar, allegedly joined in the harassment. Both the accused and his counsel are said to have verbally abused the judge, demanded her resignation, and threatened to file a false complaint to coerce her into reversing the judgment.

Unfazed by the intimidation, Magistrate Mangla has taken a firm stand. She has ordered that the accused’s conduct be reported to the National Commission for Women (NCW) and has stated unequivocally:

“Despite the intimidation, I remain committed to justice and will take necessary measures.”

The court has issued a show-cause notice to Advocate Atul Kumar, requiring him to explain his alleged misconduct and justify why criminal contempt of court proceedings should not be initiated. He has been directed to respond before the next date of hearing.

This disturbing episode is a stark reminder of the threats and pressure that members of the judiciary often face. Legal experts and citizens alike are calling for strong institutional safeguards and swift punitive action to uphold the independence and dignity of the courts.

The case is ongoing, and further developments are awaited.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more