Skip to main content

Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 now a Law: Approved by President


The Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2025 has officially become law after receiving President Droupadi Murmu’s assent on Saturday. The Bill was passed by both Houses of Parliament after intense debates, marking a significant reform in the management of waqf properties in India.  

Parliamentary Approval Amid Heated Debates  

The Rajya Sabha cleared the Bill early Friday with 128 votes in favor and 95 against. 
Following a marathon 12-hour discussion, the Lok Sabha had already approved it earlier in the week.  

What Does the New Law Aim to Achieve?

The legislation introduces major changes to improve transparency and governance in the waqf system, which oversees vast properties under Islamic endowments. Key provisions include:  

✔ Better management of waqf assets  

✔ Increased transparency in dealings  

✔ Fair representation of Muslim groups on waqf boards  

✔ Protection of heritage sites  

✔ Welfare schemes for marginalized groups, including Muslim widows and divorcees  

Government’s Stand: "A Watershed Moment"

Prime Minister Narendra Modi hailed the law as a "historic step" towards accountability in waqf administration. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), he stated:  

"For decades, the waqf system suffered from opacity. This law ensures transparency and safeguards people’s rights."

Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, who introduced the Bill, emphasized that it would benefit millions of underprivileged Muslims without interfering with waqf properties. He highlighted:  

- The Central Waqf Council will now have 22 members, with no more than four non-Muslims to maintain secular representation.  

- The Bill incorporates recommendations from a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC).  

Opposition’s Criticism: "Divisive and Unconstitutional"  

Despite government assurances, opposition parties strongly opposed the Bill:  

- Congress MP Dr. Syed Naseer Hussain accused the government of stoking communal tensions.  

- DMK’s Tiruchi Siva called it "anti-secular" and unconstitutional.  

- TMC’s Mohammad Nadimul Haque argued it violates fundamental rights.  

- AAP’s Sanjay Singh demanded its withdrawal.  

Union Home Minister Amit Shah dismissed the criticism, accusing opponents of spreading misinformation. BJP President JP Nadda defended the Bill, linking it to the UMEED initiative (Unified Waqf Management Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development) for modernizing waqf governance.  

Mixed Reactions from Political Leaders 

- Former PM HD Deve Gowda (JD-S) supported the Bill, saying powerful individuals had long misused waqf properties.  

- BJP MP Radha Mohan Das claimed past governments neglected poor Muslims, while the current regime aims to uplift them.  

- LoP Mallikarjun Kharge (Congress) urged the government to withdraw the law, fearing constitutional violations.  

- AIADMK’s Dr. M. Thambidurai backed changes in waqf board composition.  

- Minister Ramdas Athawale (RPI-A) stressed that the Bill includes all minority communities.  

Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2025 Also Passed 

Alongside the Waqf Amendment, Parliament also passed the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2025, scrapping the colonial-era 1923 Act deemed obsolete.  

What’s Next?

While supporters believe the law will empower marginalized Muslims, critics fear it may increase government control over waqf boards. As the new rules take effect, the debate over their impact continues.  

With inputs from agencies.

Why This Matters?

- Transparency Boost: Aims to curb mismanagement of waqf properties worth thousands of crores.  

- Political Divide: Reflects ongoing tensions between the government and opposition on minority issues.  

- Legal Shift: Replaces outdated laws with a modern governance framework.  


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Doctrine of Arbitrariness Under Article 14: Landmark E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu Case Explained

Introduction Equality is the cornerstone of the Indian Constitution, enshrined under Article 14 , which guarantees “equality before the law and equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.” This provision forms the foundation of India’s legal structure, ensuring fairness, non-discrimination, and uniformity in applying laws. The interpretation of Article 14 evolved significantly over time, especially with the landmark case of E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu (1974) , which introduced the Doctrine of Arbitrariness. This legal turning point  expanded the meaning of equality beyond mere classification. Understanding Article 14 – Right to Equality Article 14 of the Constitution of India states: “The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.” This provision ensures that all individuals, irrespective of race, religion, caste, gender, or place of birth, are treated equally under the...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more

Coalgate Scam (2014) – Supreme Court’s Verdict on Coal Block Allocations in India

Overview of the Coalgate Scam The Coalgate Scam , officially known as the Coal Allocation Scam , is one of India’s biggest corruption controversies. It involved the irregular allocation of coal blocks by the Indian government to private companies without competitive bidding between 2004 and 2009 , during the tenure of the UPA government . The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) estimated a potential loss of ₹1.86 lakh crore to the public exchequer, due to the non-transparent and arbitrary allocation of coal-rich blocks to select firms. What Was the Coal Allocation Scam About? Coal blocks are parcels of coal-rich land given to companies for mining. Between 2004–2009 , the government allocated over 200 coal blocks to private companies using a discretionary allotment method . No public auction was held, leading to unjust enrichment of certain private entities. Many companies that received coal blocks had little or no prior experience in coal mining . Supreme C...
Post a Comment
Read more