New Delhi, April 15, 2025 – In a significant development reinforcing judicial sensitivity in sexual violence cases, the Supreme Court of India on Tuesday cautioned judges against making inappropriate or victim-blaming remarks in matters involving crimes against women. This comes in response to controversial observations by the Allahabad High Court, including a comment that a rape survivor had "invited trouble."
A Bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and Augustine George Masih was hearing a suo motu petition concerning two bail-related orders from the Allahabad High Court in separate sexual assault cases.
“She Invited Trouble” – SC Criticizes High Court’s Remark
The apex court strongly criticized a March 11, 2025 order by Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh of the Allahabad High Court. The judge had granted bail in a rape case involving a woman who met the accused at a bar in Delhi’s Hauz Khas, stating the woman was “herself responsible” for the alleged crime.
Justice Gavai observed, “Yes, bail can be granted. But what is this discussion that ‘she herself invited trouble’? One has to be careful when saying such things, especially on this side (judges).”
Adding to the concern over public perception of such remarks,
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta remarked, “Complete justice should not only be done but also seen to be done. How a common person perceives such orders will also have to be seen.”
Earlier Controversy: “No Attempt to Rape” Observation Questioned
The Supreme Court had earlier taken suo motu cognizance of a March 17 Allahabad High Court order passed by Justice Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, which had sparked outrage. In that case, the court ruled that:
“The allegation that they grabbed her breasts, broke her pyjama string, and tried to drag her does not show they were determined to commit rape. This does not constitute attempt to rape.”
This ruling replaced charges under Section 376 IPC (rape) and POCSO Act with Section 354-B IPC (assault with intent to disrobe), thereby diluting the gravity of the offense involving a minor.
The Supreme Court stayed this order on March 26, labeling it "insensitive", and issued notices to the Central Government and the Uttar Pradesh Government for a response.
Next Supreme Court Hearing in Four Weeks
The matter has now been deferred for four weeks, with directions to serve notices to all respondents. This case is being closely followed as it highlights the increasing judicial scrutiny of how gender-based violence cases are handled in Indian courts.
Key Takeaways:
-
✅ Supreme Court slams Allahabad HC’s victim-blaming tone in a rape bail order.
-
✅ Previous HC ruling downplaying sexual assault on a minor also under review.
-
✅ SC reiterates the need for judicial sensitivity in cases of sexual violence.
The Supreme Court’s stance sends a clear message: gender justice, victim dignity, and constitutional morality must be reflected in judicial language and reasoning. The case reiterates the judiciary’s role in protecting survivors’ rights and preventing stereotypes in sexual violence jurisprudence.
Case Reference: In Re: Order dated 17.03.2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Revision No. 1449/2024 and Ancillary Issues
Comments
Post a Comment