The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 has landed before the Supreme Court, facing multiple legal challenges questioning its compatibility with India's constitutional framework. Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna's bench has agreed to consider urgent hearings on these petitions, including one filed by Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind represented by Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal.
This legislation amends the 1995 Waqf Act, which governs Islamic charitable endowments (waqf properties). The amended version, rebranded as the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act, introduces sweeping changes to waqf administration. While the government maintains these reforms aim to enhance transparency and governance, critics allege they undermine Muslim religious rights.
Key contentious provisions include:
- A five-year Islamic practice requirement for creating new waqfs
- Abolition of waqf by user (previously allowing long-standing religious use to establish waqf status)
- Restrictions on waqf-alal-aulad (family trusts) regarding women's inheritance rights
- Curbed powers of Waqf Boards to declare properties as waqf
Opponents argue these changes violate:
🔸 Article 25 (Freedom of Religion)
🔸 Article 26 (Right to Manage Religious Affairs)
🔸 Article 300A (Right to Property)
The Supreme Court's impending review will crucially examine whether the amendments:
- Constitute excessive state interference in religious matters
- Unfairly restrict traditional Islamic endowment practices
- Withstand constitutional scrutiny under Article 32
This case represents a significant test for balancing administrative reform against the protection of minority religious rights in India's pluralistic democracy. The outcome could reshape the landscape of Islamic charitable institutions nationwide. Legal experts anticipate intense judicial scrutiny of the amendment's provisions regarding property rights and religious autonomy.
The Court's decision may establish important precedents regarding state regulation of religious endowments while safeguarding fundamental rights.
Next Steps:
- Supreme Court to decide on urgent listing
- Potential constitution bench reference if fundamental rights issues are substantiated
- Interim relief applications are possible if petitioners demonstrate immediate harm
This developing legal battle underscores the delicate interplay between governance reforms and constitutional protections for religious communities.
Comments
Post a Comment