Skip to main content

Supreme Court Puts Key Waqf Act Amendments on Hold; Govt Assures No Immediate Changes


New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday recorded the Central government’s assurance that certain contentious provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025—including the inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf Boards and the de-notification of properties previously declared as Waqf—will not be enforced for now.

A three-judge bench, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna and comprising Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and KV Viswanathan, took note of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s statement that:

  • No new appointments will be made to Waqf Boards and Councils under the 2025 Act.

  • The status of already notified Waqf properties (including those recognized by courts as Waqf by usage) will remain unchanged.

The court granted the government seven days to file its response, after which petitioners can submit their rejoinders within five days. The next hearing is scheduled for May 5, where interim orders will be considered.

Background of the Legal Challenge

The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, passed by Parliament in early April, amends the 1995 law to regulate Waqf properties—Islamic religious or charitable endowments. Petitioners, including Congress MP Mohammad Jawed and AIMIM’s Asaduddin Owaisi, argue that the amendments:

  • Discriminate against Muslims by selectively targeting Waqf properties.

  • Remove the concept of "Waqf by user", jeopardizing centuries-old mosques, graveyards, and charitable properties without formal deeds.

  • Grant excessive powers to District Collectors to decide Waqf disputes.

  • Allowing non-Muslim members in Waqf Boards is raising concerns over interference in religious matters.

Meanwhile, six BJP-ruled states (Haryana, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, and Assam) have supported the amendments, citing administrative concerns.

Court’s Skepticism

During Wednesday’s hearing, the bench questioned:

  • How historical Waqf properties (like the 15th-century Jama Masjid) could prove their status under the new law.

  • Why are non-Muslims being included in Waqf Boards when Hindus are not allowed in similar Hindu endowment bodies?

  • Whether District Collectors should have sweeping powers over religious property disputes.

CJI Khanna remarked, “When a public trust is declared a Waqf 100 or 200 years ago, you can’t suddenly rewrite the past.”


Today’s Hearing

SG Mehta urged the court not to impose a stay, arguing that the law was enacted after extensive consultations. However, the bench maintained that the status quo must be preserved until a final decision.

“We are not staying the entire law, but we must ensure the existing situation isn’t disturbed,” CJI Khanna said. The court clarified that no new Waqf Board appointments will be made, and already notified Waqf properties will remain protected until further orders.

The case will next be heard on May 5.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more