Skip to main content

Love and Redemption: Kerala HC Grants Bail to 91-Year-Old Accused of Stabbing Wife, Urges Reconciliation

In an emotionally charged ruling, the Kerala High Court granted bail to 91-year-old Thevan, who was accused of stabbing his 88-year-old wife, Kunjali, after an argument over alleged infidelity. While making its decision, the court didn’t just focus on legal technicalities—it delivered a heartfelt message on love, companionship, and forgiveness in old age, urging the couple to reconcile and find peace in their twilight years.

The Incident: What Led to the Attack?

  • Date: March 21, 2025
  • Trigger: A heated confrontation—Kunjali accused Thevan of having affairs with other women.
  • Violent Reaction: In a moment of rage, Thevan stabbed her with a knife, inflicting serious injuries.
  • Charges:
    • Section 118(1) BNS – Voluntarily causing grievous hurt with a weapon.
    • Section 109(1) BNS – Attempt to murder.

The Court’s Ruling: A Lesson in Love & Forgiveness

Justice PV Kunhikrishnan, in a rare moment of judicial reflection, spoke not only as a judge but as a compassionate observer of human relationships.

"A great marriage isn’t about perfection—it’s about two imperfect people choosing to love each other despite their differences. Age doesn’t dim love; it makes it shine brighter."

He also reminded Thevan of the irreplaceable bond between spouses:

"At this stage of life, companionship is everything. Let Thevan and Kunjali spend their remaining years in peace, rather than conflict."

The judgment even invoked the words of Malayalam poet NN Kakkad’s ‘Saphalamee Yathra’, a poem that beautifully captures how love matures with time.

Why Did the Court Grant Bail?

  1. Advanced Age & Health Considerations – At 91, Thevan isn’t a threat to society.
  2. No Risk of Fleeing – Given his age and circumstances, he is unlikely to evade justice.
  3. A Hope for Reconciliation – The court believes the couple could find common ground.
  4. Bail Conditions:
    • ₹50,000 bond with two sureties.
    • Must cooperate with investigators.

Public & Legal Debate

✅ Supporters appreciate the court’s humane approach—acknowledging that even long marriages have conflicts, but forgiveness should be encouraged.
❌ Critics, however, argue that domestic violence should never be excused, no matter the age.

Important Questions Raised

  • Does emotional distress justify violent behavior?
  • Should age reduce criminal accountability?
  • Can courts play a mediator’s role in marital disputes?

Lessons from the Case

  • Love demands patience – Even after decades, conflicts arise, but understanding matters more than anger.
  • Justice isn’t just about punishment – Sometimes, compassion must shape legal decisions.
  • Elderly mental health matters – Loneliness and emotional stress can lead to extreme reactions, highlighting the need for better family support.

Final Thoughts: A Second Chance at Love?

The Kerala HC’s ruling goes beyond the courtroom—it’s a message about love, forgiveness, and the importance of companionship, even after years of turbulence. As Thevan and Kunjali navigate their final chapters together, the hope is that they choose peace over resentment.

What do you think? Should courts intervene in personal conflicts like this, or is it overstepping?


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more