Kapil Sibal Lauded as SCBA Raises ₹43 Crore for Lawyers' Welfare Fund

New Delhi: Senior Advocate and Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) President Kapil Sibal was honored on Wednesday after the lawyers' body successfully mobilized over ₹43 crore through corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. The funds, part of Sibal’s election promise, will support medical insurance and financial aid for advocates.

The felicitation ceremony, held at the Supreme Court’s Library 2 on April 9, was attended by members of the Friday Group, an academic circle of Supreme Court lawyers. Sibal emphasized that the achievement was a collective effort, stating:

“This is not for me—it is for the Bar, our family. Not a single person I approached refused, from Mukesh Ambani to Torrent. Everyone stepped forward.”

Key Highlights:

- Current Corpus: ₹43.43 crore (original target: ₹50 crore).

- Revised Goal: Sibal now aims for ₹60 crore, with plans to establish a permanent insurance scheme requiring a ₹120 crore corpus.

- Judicial Backing: Sibal revealed he discussed the matter with CJI Sanjiv Khanna, who assured government coordination. He jokingly added that if needed, Justice BR Gavai (next in line as CJI) could issue a writ of mandamus—drawing laughter from attendees.

Broader Vision for Legal Welfare

Advocate G Seshagiri (Friday Group founder) urged state and district bars to replicate the model. Sibal echoed this, stressing the need for sustainable advocacy welfare systems.

In his closing remarks, Sibal redirected praise to the legal fraternity:

“Don’t congratulate me—it’s my duty. Credit goes to your solidarity in making this possible.”

“Not a single person said no. From Mukesh Ambani to Torrent—just name it.”

—Kapil Sibal, SCBA President

Comments

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...

The Legal Catalyst

Search This Blog