Skip to main content

Joseph Shine v. Union of India (2018) – Adultery Law Declared Unconstitutional

The Joseph Shine case challenged the constitutionality of Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, a colonial-era adultery law.

Under this law:

  • Only a man could be punished for adultery.

  • A woman involved in adultery was not seen as an offender, but as a passive victim.

  • Only the husband of the woman could file a complaint—not the wife.

The law denied women equal rights, and treated them as the property of their husbands, not as individuals with agency.

What Was Challenged in Court?

The petition argued that Section 497 violated:

  • Article 14 – Right to Equality

  • Article 15 – Protection from Gender Discrimination

  • Article 21 – Right to Life, Privacy, and Dignity

Supreme Court’s Verdict – September 2018

A 5-judge Constitution Bench (CJI Dipak Misra, Justices Nariman, Khanwilkar, Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra) unanimously struck down Section 497 IPC.

Key Supreme Court Rulings:

  1. Adultery Law Was Gender-Biased

    • It discriminated against men and infantilized women, treating them as if they lacked autonomy.

    • Violated Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution.

  2. Right to Privacy and Sexual Autonomy

    • Citing the Puttaswamy judgment (2017), the Court held that private choices in relationships cannot be criminalized.

    • The state has no role in consensual affairs between adults.

  3. Adultery is Not a Criminal Offense

    • It may be immoral or a civil ground for divorce, but it cannot be treated as a crime.

  4. Outdated Morality Cannot Justify Criminal Laws

    • The law was based on Victorian patriarchal values, not modern constitutional principles.

Note on Civil Consequences

Although Section 497 was struck down, adultery still remains a valid ground for divorce under personal laws like the Hindu Marriage Act.

Significance of the Joseph Shine Judgment

  1. Landmark judgment on gender justice in India

  2. Struck down a 158-year-old colonial law that violated women’s rights

  3. Affirmed sexual autonomy and privacy as part of individual dignity

  4. Brought Indian law in line with modern constitutional values of equality, liberty, and personal freedom

Case Citation:

Joseph Shine v. Union of India, (2019) 3 SCC 39


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more