Skip to main content

Is the Preamble’s ‘Justice’ Failing Sexual Assault Survivors?

🛑 Introduction: When the Preamble Meets Reality

"We, the people of India, solemnly resolve to secure… JUSTICE…"

This promise lies at the very heart of our Constitution. But what happens when survivors of sexual violence face blame instead of justice?

The recent Supreme Court vs. Allahabad High Court clash over victim-blaming exposes a painful truth: India’s justice system often betrays the very ideals it’s meant to uphold.

🧾 What Sparked the Controversy?

🏛️ Allahabad High Court’s Remarks (March 2024)

  • Granted bail to a rape accused.

  • Justified the decision by claiming the survivor “invited trouble” by meeting the accused at a bar.

  • Echoed the dangerous and familiar logic: “She should’ve known better.”

⚖️ Supreme Court's Response (April 2025)

  • Strongly condemned the HC’s remarks as “insensitive.”

  • Emphasized:

    "Bail is discretion, but victim-blaming isn’t." – Justice Gavai

📜 What Does the Preamble’s 'Justice' Really Mean?

The Constitution of India promises:

  • Social Justice: Equal treatment under the law.

  • Gender Justice: Protection of dignity under Article 21.

⚠️ The Ground Reality:

  • Only 27% of rape cases end in conviction (NCRB, 2023).

  • Survivors are subjected to:

    • Police mistrust – “Were you drinking?”

    • Courtroom trauma – “Why didn’t you resist?”

🔁 It's Not Just One Judge—It’s a Pattern

👇 Past Judicial Missteps:

  • 2021: Madras HC suggested marriage between rapist and survivor.

  • 2022: MP HC labeled pre-marital sex “immoral” in a rape case.

The message is loud and clear: Moral policing often overrides constitutional rights.

🛠️ The Real Fix: Reforms We Desperately Need

To uphold justice for sexual assault survivors in India, we need systemic change:

✅ Legal Reforms:

  • Mandatory sensitivity training for all judges.

  • Fast-track courts for gender-based violence cases.

  • Zero tolerance for judicial victim-blaming—public apologies or disciplinary action.

✊ What You Can Do:

  • Speak out: Call out problematic remarks—tag @MLJ_GoI on X.

  • Support survivor-centered NGOs:

🧠 Conclusion: Justice Is a Duty—Not Just a Word

The Preamble isn’t a poetic introduction—it’s a promise soaked in struggle and sacrifice.

Every time a judge blames a survivor, it doesn’t just betray a victim—it betrays the nation’s constitutional soul.

🗣️ What’s your take?
Should judges face consequences for victim-blaming?
Drop a comment. Share your voice. Let’s build a better system—together. 💬


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more