Skip to main content

Delhi High Court Cites Mahabharata to Condemn Patriarchal Mindset in Adultery Case


In a powerful indictment of lingering patriarchal norms, the Delhi High Court recently drew a striking parallel between a modern-day adultery case and the treatment of Draupadi in the Mahabharata. The April 17, 2025, judgment highlighted how women continue to be viewed through a regressive lens, despite legal strides toward gender equality.

Mahabharata as a Cautionary Tale

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, presiding over the case, remarked:

“The consequences of treating women as chattel were starkly illustrated in the Mahabharata, yet this regressive mindset persisted until the Supreme Court struck down Section 497 in the Joseph Shine case (2018).”

This literary reference underscored the Court’s concern over the enduring impact of societal norms that objectify women, echoing the mythological moment when Draupadi was wagered away by her husband.

Background of the Case

The case involved a couple married in 1998. In 2010, the husband accused his wife of having an extramarital affair after discovering call logs and hotel stay records indicating her overnight presence with another man in Lucknow. He issued a legal notice and filed a criminal complaint under the now-defunct Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

  • The trial court initially discharged the accused for lack of evidence of sexual intercourse.

  • However, the Sessions Court later summoned him to face trial.

  • The couple eventually divorced in 2016.

Legal Issue: Can the Joseph Shine Ruling Apply Retrospectively?

The accused challenged the summons before the High Court, arguing that the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Joseph Shine v. Union of India—which declared Section 497 unconstitutional—should apply to his pending case.

The Court agreed, citing the precedent set in Maj. Genl. A.S. Gauraya v. S.N. Thakur (1986), which held that constitutional invalidations apply retrospectively to all pending matters.

Key Observations by the Court

  • No Presumption of Adultery: Staying overnight at a hotel is not conclusive proof of a sexual relationship.

  • Insufficient Evidence: No oral or documentary evidence confirmed the allegations.

  • Invalid Law: Section 497 was declared unconstitutional in 2018 and cannot be used to prosecute.

Final Verdict

The High Court set aside the summoning order, discharging the accused from the adultery charges. The Court emphasized that moral judgments cannot be the basis of legal punishment, especially under a law that has been constitutionally struck down.

Why This Judgment Matters

This verdict not only reiterates the irrelevance of outdated laws like Section 497 but also sends a strong message against patriarchal biases that continue to influence both society and legal proceedings. By invoking the Mahabharata, the Court rooted its reasoning in cultural context, making a compelling case for constitutional morality over social orthodoxy.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more