Skip to main content

Central Government Appoints Six New Judges to Allahabad High Court

New Delhi, April 17, 2025: The Central government on Tuesday (April 16) approved the appointment of six judicial officers as judges of the Allahabad High Court, as confirmed by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal in a post on X (formerly Twitter).  

Newly Appointed Judges  

The judicial officers elevated as High Court judges are:  

1. Jitendra Kumar Sinha

2. Anil Kumar-X 

3. Sandeep Jain 

4. Avnish Saxena

5. Madan Pal Singh

6. Harvir Singh

Collegium Recommendations vs. Government Approval  

- Earlier this month, the Supreme Court Collegium had recommended eight names for appointment.  

- However, the Centre cleared only six names, leaving two recommendations pending.  

Vacancy Crisis in Allahabad High Court

- The Allahabad High Court, one of India’s largest, has a sanctioned strength of 160 judges.  

- As of April 1, 2025, it is functioning with only 79 judges, leaving more than 50% posts vacant.  

- A plea is pending before the High Court seeking urgent filling of vacancies to address the backlog of cases.  

Recent Appointments & Transfers 

- Earlier, the Centre had cleared the appointment of three judges to the Allahabad High Court by approving the transfer of:  

  1. Justice Yashwant Varma  

  2. Justice Chandra Dhari Singh 

  3. Justice Arindam Sinha

Next Steps

With the latest appointments, the working strength of the Allahabad High Court will rise to 85 judges, but 75 vacancies will still remain. The pending Collegium recommendations and further appointments will be closely watched.  

The move comes amid growing concerns over judicial delays due to shortage of judges in one of India’s busiest High Courts.  

(Further updates awaited.)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Doctrine of Arbitrariness Under Article 14: Landmark E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu Case Explained

Introduction Equality is the cornerstone of the Indian Constitution, enshrined under Article 14 , which guarantees “equality before the law and equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.” This provision forms the foundation of India’s legal structure, ensuring fairness, non-discrimination, and uniformity in applying laws. The interpretation of Article 14 evolved significantly over time, especially with the landmark case of E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu (1974) , which introduced the Doctrine of Arbitrariness. This legal turning point  expanded the meaning of equality beyond mere classification. Understanding Article 14 – Right to Equality Article 14 of the Constitution of India states: “The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.” This provision ensures that all individuals, irrespective of race, religion, caste, gender, or place of birth, are treated equally under the...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more

Coalgate Scam (2014) – Supreme Court’s Verdict on Coal Block Allocations in India

Overview of the Coalgate Scam The Coalgate Scam , officially known as the Coal Allocation Scam , is one of India’s biggest corruption controversies. It involved the irregular allocation of coal blocks by the Indian government to private companies without competitive bidding between 2004 and 2009 , during the tenure of the UPA government . The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) estimated a potential loss of ₹1.86 lakh crore to the public exchequer, due to the non-transparent and arbitrary allocation of coal-rich blocks to select firms. What Was the Coal Allocation Scam About? Coal blocks are parcels of coal-rich land given to companies for mining. Between 2004–2009 , the government allocated over 200 coal blocks to private companies using a discretionary allotment method . No public auction was held, leading to unjust enrichment of certain private entities. Many companies that received coal blocks had little or no prior experience in coal mining . Supreme C...
Post a Comment
Read more