Skip to main content

Bengaluru Court Denies Prajwal Revanna’s Plea, Upholds Rape Charges | Latest Updates


In a significant development, a Bengaluru trial court has rejected suspended JD(S) leader Prajwal Revanna’s plea to dismiss the rape case filed against him. The court has framed serious charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the IT Act, marking a crucial step in the high-profile sexual assault case.  

Key Charges Against Prajwal Revanna  

The Additional City Civil and Sessions Court in Bengaluru has charged Prajwal Revanna under:  
- IPC Section 376(2)(k) – Rape by a person in a position of authority  
- IPC Section 376(2)(n) – Repeated rape of the same victim  
- IPC Sections 354A, 354B, 354C – Sexual harassment, assault with intent to disrobe, and voyeurism  
- IPC Section 506 – Criminal intimidation  
- IPC Section 201 – Destruction of evidence  
- IT Act Section 66E – Violation of privacy by circulating explicit content  

The next hearing is scheduled for April 9, 2024, as the SIT probe continues.  

Case Background: Allegations Against Prajwal Revanna  

The case involves shocking allegations that Prajwal Revanna, the grandson of former PM H.D. Deve Gowda, repeatedly raped his domestic help at his family’s farmhouse. The first incident reportedly occurred in 2021 during the COVID-19 lockdown.  

Why Did the Victim Stay Silent?  

- The survivor alleged that Revanna recorded the assaults and threatened to leak the videos if she spoke out.  
- She quit her job but remained silent until leaked video of multiple victims surfaced online.  
- Reports suggest over 2,900 explicit videos were circulated on social media and porn sites, sparking nationwide outrage.  

Prajwal Revanna’s Arrest & Legal Battle 

- After the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, Revanna fled to Germany but was arrested upon his return on May 31, 2024.  
- The Karnataka SIT, investigating the case, filed a chargesheet in August 2024, citing forensic evidence.  
- Revanna sought discharge, claiming political conspiracy and lack of evidence, but the court dismissed his plea.  

Court’s Strong Stand on the Case

The Bengaluru court ruled that:  
✔ Sufficient evidence exists to proceed with the trial.  
✔ The delay in filing the complaint (2021 assault, 2024 FIR) does not weaken the case.  
✔ No woman would falsely accuse someone of rape in India, given societal stigma.  
✔ The SIT has legal authority to investigate and file charges.  

Next Steps in the Prajwal Revanna Case  

- The trial will continue, with the next hearing on April 9.  
- The Karnataka SIT will present forensic and digital evidence.  
- Revanna remains in judicial custody as the case unfolds.  

Why This Case Matters

This high-profile sexual assault case has drawn national attention due to:  
🔴 Political connections (JD(S) leader, Deve Gowda’s grandson)  
🔴 Shocking scale of abuse (2,900+ videos leaked)  
🔴 Legal implications for powerful figures accused of sexual crimes  

Legal Representation

- Senior Advocate Aruna Shyam & Advocate Arun G defended Prajwal Revanna.  
- The Karnataka CID’s SIT is leading the prosecution.  

Stay tuned with THE LEGAL CATALYST for latest updates.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more