Skip to main content

Bar Associations in J&K Call for Judicial Work Boycott on April 23 to Protest Pahalgam Terror Attack


Srinagar/Jammu, April 23 – Legal associations across Jammu and Kashmir have strongly condemned the deadly terrorist attack that struck the Baisaran Valley in Pahalgam on April 22, claiming the lives of 28 civilians and injuring several others. In response, multiple bar associations have announced a collective boycott of judicial work today (April 23), in both mourning and protest.

The Jammu & Kashmir High Court Bar Association (Jammu), led by President Advocate K. Nirmal Kotwal, described the attack as a “cowardly and inhumane act of violence” that deliberately targeted innocent people. The association has declared a complete Jammu Bandh and urged all lawyers in the region to suspend court proceedings for the day. It also appealed to civil society organizations to stand in solidarity and demand justice for the victims.

In a similar stance, the Jammu & Kashmir High Court Bar Association (Srinagar), under President Advocate Waseem Gul, called the incident a “barbaric assault with no place in a civilized society.” Lawyers practicing in the Srinagar High Court as well as subordinate courts across the Kashmir Valley have been directed to refrain from judicial duties as a tribute to those who lost their lives.

The Kashmir Jurists Bar Association also issued a strong condemnation, referring to the attack as an “inhuman act by Pakistan-sponsored terrorists.” The association called for a peaceful Kashmir Bandh, urging all citizens to come together in unity against the growing threat of terrorism in the region.

In a unified voice, all three bar associations labeled the attack a grave threat to peace and humanity. They called upon the government to swiftly identify and punish the perpetrators while also demanding enhanced security arrangements to protect civilians from future attacks.

The coordinated protest by the legal fraternity highlights the widespread outrage and sorrow caused by the Pahalgam tragedy. It reflects a growing call for justice, accountability, and renewed efforts to safeguard lives in one of India’s most vulnerable regions.

As the boycott unfolds, pressing questions remain: Will the government expedite its investigation? And will tangible security reforms follow to prevent further such atrocities? The coming days may determine the answers.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more