Skip to main content

The Landmark Golak Nath Case (1967): A Turning Point in Indian Constitutional Law

Introduction

The case of Golak Nath v. State of Punjab (1967) is one of the most significant judgments in Indian constitutional history. It played a crucial role in shaping the relationship between Fundamental Rights and the amendment powers of Parliament. The Supreme Court’s ruling in this case laid the foundation for the Basic Structure Doctrine, which was later reinforced in the Kesavananda Bharati case. This landmark Indian constitutional law case continues to influence legal interpretations today.

Name of the Case

I. C. Golaknath & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anrs. (27 February, 1967)

Background of the Case

Before the Golak Nath case ruling, there was ongoing debate over whether Parliament had the authority to amend Fundamental Rights in India. The First, Fourth, and Seventeenth Constitutional Amendments had already been enacted, restricting certain fundamental rights, particularly the right to property in India.

I.C. Golak Nath and his family, owners of agricultural land in Punjab, contested the Punjab Security and Land Tenures Act, asserting that it infringed upon their Fundamental Rights under the Indian Constitution, specifically under Articles 14, 19, and 31.

Facts of the Case

  • I.C. Golak Nath and his family owned 500 acres of farmland in Punjab.
  • The Punjab Government, under the Punjab Security and Land Tenures Act, 1953, imposed land ceilings, limiting the amount of land an individual could hold.
  • Golak Nath’s family challenged this act, arguing that it violated their Right to Property under the Indian Constitution under Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31.
  • The case was brought before the Supreme Court of India, questioning whether Parliament had the power to amend Fundamental Rights in India.

Issues Raised

  1. Can Parliament amend Fundamental Rights under Article 368?
  2. Do Constitutional Amendments fall under the definition of “law” under Article 13?
  3. Is the First, Fourth, and Seventeenth Amendment Acts constitutional?

Judgment of the Supreme Court

The Golak Nath case verdict was delivered by the Supreme Court in a narrow 6:5 majority decision. The ruling stated that:

  • Fundamental Rights in India are sacrosanct and beyond the amending power of Parliament.
  • Article 368 does not give Parliament the power to amend Fundamental Rights.
  • The term “law” under Article 13 includes Constitutional Amendments, meaning that any amendment violating Fundamental Rights in India would be invalid.
  • The ruling invalidated retrospective amendments but allowed Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights prospectively by creating a new Constituent Assembly.

Major People Involved

  • Chief Justice K. Subba Rao – Led the majority judgment and played a key role in defining the limits of Parliament’s power in constitutional amendments.
  • Justice J.C. Shah, Justice S.M. Sikri, Justice Vaidialingam, Justice R.S. Bachawat, and Justice Mitter – Formed the majority judgment.
  • Justice Hidayatullah, Justice Wanchoo, and other dissenting judges argued that Parliament had the power to amend Fundamental Rights.

Significance and Impact

  • The Golak Nath Supreme Court judgment restricted Parliament’s power and was seen as a major victory for Fundamental Rights under the Indian Constitution.
  • It laid the foundation for the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), which introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine.
  • The government, under Indira Gandhi, passed the 24th Amendment Act in 1971, nullifying the Golak Nath case decision and reaffirming Parliament’s power to amend Fundamental Rights.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What was the key issue in the Golak Nath case?

The case revolved around whether Parliament had the power to amend Fundamental Rights under the Indian Constitution.

2. What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Golak Nath case?

The court ruled that Fundamental Rights cannot be amended by Parliament, as they are beyond its amending power.

3. How did the government respond to the Golak Nath case judgment?

The government introduced the 24th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1971, which restored Parliament’s power to amend Fundamental Rights.

4. What was the impact of the Golak Nath case on Indian constitutional law?

It set the stage for the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973), which introduced the Basic Structure Doctrine, limiting Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.

5. Is the Golak Nath judgment still valid today?

No, it was overturned by the Kesavananda Bharati case, which allowed Parliament to amend Fundamental Rights in India but not violate the Constitution’s Basic Structure.

Share Your Views

The Golak Nath case remains a milestone in India's legal and constitutional history. Do you believe Fundamental Rights in India should be amendable by Parliament, or should they remain untouched? Share your perspective in the comments section below!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more