Skip to main content

Reservations in India: Understanding the Legal Framework and Recent Amendments



Introduction

Reservation in India is a form of affirmative action designed to uplift historically disadvantaged communities. It ensures equal education, employment, and political opportunities for marginalized sections of society. Governed primarily by constitutional provisions, the reservation system has undergone several amendments and judicial reviews.

This blog aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal framework of reservations in India, significant amendments, and recent developments.


Legal Framework Governing Reservations in India

The Indian Constitution provides the foundation for the reservation system. Some key constitutional provisions include:

  • Article 15(4) and 15(5): Empower the state to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC), Scheduled Castes (SC), and Scheduled Tribes (ST).

  • Article 16(4): Allows reservation in public employment for backward classes that are not adequately represented.

  • Article 46: Directs the state to promote the educational and economic interests of weaker sections.

  • Article 330 and 332: Provide for the reservation of seats in the Parliament and State Legislative Assemblies for SCs and STs.


Evolution of Reservations in India

1. Early Post-Independence Period

  • Initially, reservations were provided for SCs and STs to address historical injustices.

  • The First Amendment Act, of 1951 added Article 15(4) to empower the state to provide special provisions for backward classes.

2. Mandal Commission and OBC Reservations

  • The Mandal Commission (1979) recommended 27% reservations for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in public employment.

  • In 1992, the Supreme Court upheld the implementation of the Mandal Commission’s recommendations in the landmark case of Indra Sawhney v. Union of India.

3. Recent Amendments and Developments

  • 103rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 2019: Introduced 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in government jobs and educational institutions.

  • Supreme Court Verdicts: The validity of EWS reservations has been upheld with conditions ensuring they do not infringe on the rights of other communities.


Recent Amendments and Their Impact

  1. 103rd Amendment Act

    • Provides 10% reservation to EWS from the general category.

    • Applicable to government institutions and private unaided institutions, excluding minority institutions.

  2. Implementation of Vertical and Horizontal Reservations

    • Vertical Reservations are applied for SC, ST, OBC, and EWS categories.

    • Horizontal Reservations ensure additional reservations within categories for women, persons with disabilities, and ex-servicemen.

Judicial Interpretation and Landmark Cases

  1. Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)

    • Capped total reservations at 50% to ensure meritocracy.

    • Excluded creamy layer (socially and economically advanced individuals) from OBC reservation.

  2. Jarnail Singh v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018)

    • Upheld the exclusion of the creamy layer within SCs and STs.

  3. Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India (2022)

    • Validated the 10% EWS reservation without breaching the 50% cap.


Challenges and Criticisms of the Reservation System

  • Political Manipulation: Reservations are sometimes used as a political tool to gain vote banks.

  • Merit vs. Reservation Debate: Critics argue that excessive reservations may compromise merit-based selection.

  • Economic Backwardness: The reservation system primarily focuses on social backwardness, often neglecting economically disadvantaged individuals.

  • Caste-based Identity Reinforcement: There are concerns that reservations perpetuate caste identities instead of reducing caste-based discrimination.


Conclusion

Reservations in India remain a significant tool for achieving social justice and inclusive growth. While recent amendments like the EWS reservation aim to address economic disparities, continuous judicial scrutiny ensures that reservations do not lead to unfair advantages or marginalize deserving candidates. A balanced approach that considers both social and economic factors will ensure the system serves its intended purpose of uplifting the disadvantaged.

FAQs

1. Who is eligible for EWS reservation? EWS reservation applies to individuals from the general category with an annual family income below ₹8 lakhs and who meet other specified asset criteria.

2. Can SC/ST candidates avail of EWS reservation? No, EWS reservation is exclusively for economically weaker sections from the unreserved category.

3. What is the current reservation percentage in India? Total reservations in India include 15% for SCs, 7.5% for STs, 27% for OBCs, and 10% for EWS, subject to the 50% ceiling in most cases.

4. Are private sector jobs under reservation? No, the reservation policy currently applies only to public sector jobs and educational institutions.

5. What is the significance of the 50% cap on reservations? The 50% cap, established in the Indra Sawhney judgment, aims to balance merit and affirmative action.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more