Skip to main content

Live-In Relationships in India: Legality, Rights, and Landmark Cases


Live-in relationships in India are becoming increasingly common, but they're still shrouded in legal and social uncertainty. While Indian courts have recognized live-in relationships, safeguarding the rights of partners, especially women and children, there's still a long way to go.

Legal Status

- Not Illegal, But Not Explicitly Recognized: Live-in relationships aren't explicitly recognized under Indian law, but they're also not considered illegal. Courts have upheld the right of consenting adults to cohabit, citing Article 21 of the Constitution.

- Protection Under the Domestic Violence Act: The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005, provides rights to women in live-in relationships, treating them as akin to wives under specific circumstances.

- Legitimacy of Children: Children born out of live-in relationships are considered legitimate, with inheritance rights over their parents' self-acquired property.


Important Judicial Precedents

- S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal & Anr (2010): The Supreme Court ruled that live-in relationships fall under the right to life and personal liberty.

- Indra Sarma v. V.K.V. Sarma (2013): The court categorized live-in relationships into different types, clarifying that long-term, stable relationships qualify for protection under the Domestic Violence Act.

- D. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal (2010): The Supreme Court held that live-in relationships must meet specific criteria, such as mutual commitment, shared household, and public recognition, to be considered marriage-like arrangements.


Rights of Partners

- Right to Maintenance: Women in live-in relationships are entitled to maintenance under Section 125 of the CrPC and the Domestic Violence Act.

- Inheritance Rights of Children: Children born from live-in relationships have rights over their parents' self-acquired property.

- Protection Against Domestic Violence: The Domestic Violence Act extends protection to women in live-in relationships.

- Right to Freedom and Privacy: Courts have upheld the right of individuals to choose their partners and cohabit without interference.

Challenges and Social Acceptance

- Societal Stigma: Live-in relationships are still frowned upon in many parts of India.

- Legal Ambiguities: There's no specific legislation governing live-in relationships, leading to uncertainties.

- Property and Succession Issues: Partners don't automatically gain inheritance rights over each other’s property.


In conclusion, live-in relationships in India are legally recognized, but not explicitly governed by any statute. Courts have taken a progressive stance, ensuring protection for women and children while upholding individual freedoms. However, societal acceptance remains a challenge. With evolving social norms, live-in relationships may see clearer legal recognition in the future.

##What are your thoughts on live-in relationships? Should they be given the same legal status as marriage? Let us know in the comments!


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...
Post a Comment
Read more

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...
Post a Comment
Read more