Bombay High Court Grants Yuzvendra Chahal Swift Divorce Ahead of IPL 2025!

The Bombay High Court has granted Indian cricketer Yuzvendra Chahal and his estranged wife, Dhanashree Verma, a waiver of the mandatory six-month cooling-off period for mutual divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act. This decision comes just in time for Chahal to join his team, Kings XI Punjab, as the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025 kicks off on March 22.

Justice Madhav Jamdar

Justice Madhav Jamdar, presiding over the case, instructed the family court to finalize the divorce by March 20. The court acknowledged that the couple had lived apart for more than 2.5 years and had complied with the terms of their mutual consent agreement, including arrangements for permanent alimony.

Although the family court had earlier denied their plea due to partial compliance with alimony payments, the High Court ruled that the remaining payment was scheduled post-divorce, clearing all procedural hurdles. This aligns with the 2017 Supreme Court judgment that permits waiving the cooling-off period if there is no chance of reconciliation.

Chahal and Dhanashree tied the knot in December 2020 but separated in June 2022, filing for divorce in February 2025. This decision underscores the judiciary’s efforts to adapt to time-sensitive matters without compromising legal protocols.

With his divorce proceedings resolved, Yuzvendra Chahal is all set to focus on his cricketing commitments in IPL 2025. Stay tuned for updates on this story and the latest IPL action!

Comments

India’s Extradition Treaties: How They Impact the Vijay Mallya & Nirav Modi Cases

Introduction Extradition is a critical tool in international law that enables countries to hand over fugitives to jurisdictions where they face criminal charges. India has signed extradition treaties with over 50 countries and extradition arrangements with 11 others to curb financial crimes, terrorism, and other serious offenses. However, high-profile cases like Vijay Mallya and Nirav Modi have tested India's extradition mechanisms and diplomatic relations. This article explores India's extradition laws, its treaties, and the challenges faced in these landmark cases. Understanding Extradition Laws in India 1. The Extradition Act, 1962 The primary legal framework governing extradition in India is T he Extradition Act, 1962 . This Act provides the conditions and procedures for extradition between India and foreign nations. Extradition Treaty Countries : India has formal agreements with over 50 countries , including the UK, USA, UAE, and Canada , which provide a legal basis for...

The Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in Framing the Indian Constitution

Introduction Dr. Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, popularly known as the architect of the Indian Constitution, played a pivotal role in drafting and shaping the fundamental law of independent India. As the Chairman of the Drafting Committee, he was instrumental in laying the foundation of a just, inclusive, and democratic India. His contributions not only ensured legal safeguards for marginalized communities but also established India as a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic republic. In this blog, we will explore Dr. Ambedkar’s contributions to the making of the Indian Constitution, his vision, the challenges he faced, and his lasting impact on Indian democracy. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: A Visionary Leader Born on April 14, 1891, Dr. Ambedkar was a social reformer, economist, and legal expert. His early experiences with caste-based discrimination fueled his determination to uplift the downtrodden and establish a legal system based on equality and justice. He earned multiple degrees, includi...

R v. Dudley and Stephens (1884): A Landmark Case on Necessity Defense

Introduction The 1884 case of R v. Dudley and Stephens (14 QBD 273) is one of the most pivotal rulings in English criminal law, specifically regarding the Defense of Necessity in murder cases . This landmark judgment established the legal precedent that necessity cannot be invoked as a defense for murder , even in dire, life-threatening circumstances. Case Background: Survival at Sea In July 1884, Thomas Dudley, Edward Stephens, Brooks, and Richard Parker (a 17-year-old cabin boy) were left adrift after their yacht, Mignonette , sank. For over 20 days, the men survived on limited resources, including turnips and a turtle they managed to catch. As the situation worsened and Parker became gravely weak, Dudley and Stephens resolved to kill and consume Parker in order to survive. Although Brooks abstained from participating in Parker's death, he later consumed Parker's flesh. On the 24th day, the survivors were rescued by a passing ship. Upon their return to England, Dudley and St...

The Legal Catalyst

Search This Blog